for their stern reaction on the end run acrobatics of the giant:
The commissioner said Google was asked in August to take various measures and had not complied with the requests.
for their stern reaction on the end run acrobatics of the giant:
The commissioner said Google was asked in August to take various measures and had not complied with the requests.
Continuing my recent discussion about OpenID and considering OpenID usage for authenticating to OSGeo services, I wanted to make a short review of its disadvantages. The OpenID advantages are well-known and can be described with a short statement:
open, decentralized, free framework, which allows Internet users to control their digital life with single identity
Stefan Brand collected number of opinions about OpenID and compiled a very interesting post on his blog about problem(s) with OpenID. Stefan’s blog entry is pretty long, so to understand his findings easier, I decided to abstract key thoughts on that matter.
Stefan summarized main problems and sources of OpenID criticism as follows:
OpenID is highly vulnerable to phishing and other attacks, creates insurmountable privacy problems, is not a trust system, suffers from usability problems, and makes it unappealing to become an OpenID consumer.
Next, complaints about the OpenID framework are presented in a few categories, which I’m going to summarize below.