Mateusz Loskot :: hacking on, working out, living up

Implicit conversion is less than bless

29 Sep 2011 | mloskot

A quick example on how frivolous and to all appearances useful design of a C++ class can kick the rear aspect of your personality hard. In Unicode-enabled code using wchar_t as character data carrier:

#include <comutil.h>
#include <sstream>
int main()
   std::wostringstream oss;
   _bstr_t str(L"abc"); 
   oss << str;

Now, remembering that wchar_t has made it into the C++ ages ago, hich version of operator<<`` is called here?

The example above is equivalent to the following code:

std::wostringstream oss;
_bstr_t str(L"abc"); 
oss << static_cast<char*>(str);

Possibly, it is because of failure of template argument deduction as specified in C++/ I’d be interested to learn if this interpretation is correct or why, if it is not.

Fork me on GitHub