Archive for the ‘tools’ Category

git info script

Saturday, March 6th, 2010

As a long time user of Subversion, I’ve got used to use of svn info command. Since I started drifting to Git system, I’ve missed this command pretty much until I found git-info script crafted by Duane Johnson

Kudos to Duane! And, I suggest any SVN user who reincarnated as Git user to grab and try it.

CMake interview for FLOSS Weekly at 4:30 EST

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

Bill Hoffman just notified on the CMake mailing list:

At 4:30, I am going to be interviewed for FLOSS Weekly.
The chat is here:
http://irc.twit.tv/
The video is here:
http://live.twit.tv/
Should be going on some time around 4:30 EST.

It’s on now.

UPDATE: FLOSS Weekly 111: CMake archived audio podcast

SqlGeometry and POINT EMPTY in WKB

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Inspired by question Paul Ramsey asked today morning on IRC, I’ve inspected what kind of Well-Known-Binary output gives SqlGeometry for EMPTY geometries of all the seven geometry types as specified in OGC SFS. The SqlGeometry class is available from SQL Server System CLR Types for .NET Framework. Here we go.

I checked Well-Known-Binary output as returned by the SqlGeometry method STAsBinary(). Here is a small test program written in C#:

using System;
using System.Linq;
using Microsoft.SqlServer.Types;
namespace SqlGeometryEmpty
{
  class Test
  {
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
      foreach (string type in
         Enum.GetNames(typeof(OpenGisGeometryType)))
      {
        string wkt = type.ToUpper() + " EMPTY";
        SqlGeometry geom = SqlGeometry.Parse(wkt);
        byte[] wkb = geom.STAsBinary().Buffer;
        string wkbhex = string.Join("",
          wkb.Select(
            b => b.ToString("X2")).ToArray());

        Console.WriteLine("{0}\n{1} ({2} bytes)\n",
          wkt, wkbhex, wkb.Length);
      }
    }
  }
}

The first observation is that WKB of EMPTY geometry for all types is returned as a a slightly different binary. All the binary forms are truncated to nine bytes. The first byte indicates endianness as expected. The second chunk of four bytes indicate geometry type. It is exactly as defined in OGC specifications. The third chunk of remaining four bytes are set to Zero and seem to play a role of size specifier: number of points in LINESTRING or number of rings in POLYGON, number of points in MULTIPOINT, and so on. This makes another observation that WKB for EMPTY is reported as a collection of primitive components.

The difference in binary of WKB of EMPTY geometry I mentioned is in that the actual type of input geometry is preserved, so there seems to be no implicit translation to geometry of some other type.

So far so good but not for too long. In fact, SqlGeometry implicitly casts POINT EMPTY to MULTIPOINT EMPTY geometry with the WKB of the following form (in hex):

010400000000000000

Here is complete output of the test program above:

POINT EMPTY
010400000000000000 (9 bytes)

LINESTRING EMPTY
010200000000000000 (9 bytes)

POLYGON EMPTY
010300000000000000 (9 bytes)

MULTIPOINT EMPTY
010400000000000000 (9 bytes)

MULTILINESTRING EMPTY
010500000000000000 (9 bytes)

MULTIPOLYGON EMPTY
010600000000000000 (9 bytes)

GEOMETRYCOLLECTION EMPTY
010700000000000000 (9 bytes)

A word about how PostGIS behaves. PostGIS reports GEOMETRYCOLLECTION EMPTY, regardless of actual type of input EMPTY geometry. It is in hex form:

010700000000000000

Generally, there is not many choices of how to report EMPTY geometry in clear and usable way and a form of collection with size equal to Zero seems to be the most appropriate choice. POINT EMPTY reported with type set to POINT (010100000000000000) would be ambiguous as feels like truncated or invalid form of POINT(0 0), especially in programming languages like C where native dynamic allocated arrays do not carry information about their size. IOW, geometry type is not enough information to process binary form of POINT EMPTY properly.

Reporting EMPTY geometries as a collection is a useful convention that seems to work well. PostGIS behaves about it in the very consistent manner reporting one type for all empties. SqlGeometry, so SQL Server, forces programmers to write a few more lines of code to handle all the possible cases. Yet another original exotic solution from Microsoft.

Consistent API is a bless!

Update: consistent specification of interface is even better.

Using Git with GDAL repository

Saturday, February 13th, 2010

I have mirrored Subversion trunk of GDAL repository on Gitorious – a free hosting for collaborating on distributed open source projects. It is available as svn-trunk repository of gdal project.

The main motivation is that it simplifies development of experiments in case one needs version control or complete disconnection from SVN trunk for some period. Thanks to git-svn, it is possible to push changes back to the trunk.

I outlined the process of maintaining GDAL trunk using Git in the Wiki article Using Git To Maintain GDAL Workflow.

The synchronization is not a time consuming process at all but even that I hope to make it automatic process in near future. First, I have to ship my little personal server to a remote data centre and I’m hoping to do it next week. Lucky bastard going to bask in the warm sun of Portugal :-)

Kitware Developer blog launched

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

CMake - cross-platform build systemA few minutes ago, Bill Hoffman from Kitware posted short message to the CMake project mailing list with an interesting announce:

Kitware launched its first developer blog today with contributions from Company technical and business leaders.

The CMake build system is one of the main category of topics on the Kitware blog, so I presume it may be of interest of OSGeo Community as the CMake build system is slowly winning over more and more folks here :-)

First CMake-related post is about Deploying on Windows with DLL Manifest Issue

Another interesting post on the blog is Will Schroeder’s answer to the question Why Open Source Will Rule Scientific Computing? It’s really worth reading.

Git vs Mercurial

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

One of possible and reasonable answers given at gitvsmercurial.com

gitvsmercurial.com

Mouse vs keyboard quotes of the day

Saturday, January 16th, 2010

My two favourite quotes I’ve remembered from today’s thread about programming using a proportional font and other stuff that happened on, as busy as always, ACCU mailing list:

For me, when coding I think fast and I type just as fast, and every time I have to touch that stupid mouse I curse the idiot who failed to add or, worse, removed (which seems to happen as software “evolves”) the menus/shortcuts/tabbing-logic that would allow me never to lose my thread, or efficiency.

— Matthew

and

I’ve watched people using IDEs (mainly on Windows) and usually I wonder if I’m going to die of old age before they finish carrying out various simple editing tasks by searching through menu trees, navigate through dialogue boxes, clicking on this option and that option (…) I often wonder if I should only have to work 20 hour weeks as I can get my typing-in work done twice as quickly as some other people :)

— Stewart

Signed, with both hands.