Comments on: Building libLAS with CMake http://mateusz.loskot.net/2009/09/28/building-liblas-with-cmake/ mloskot's life, programming, c++, geo and adventures Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:38:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: mloskot http://mateusz.loskot.net/2009/09/28/building-liblas-with-cmake/comment-page-1/#comment-2517 mloskot Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:24:17 +0000 http://mateusz.loskot.net/?p=1019#comment-2517 Luigi, I prepared CMake configuration for libgeotiff - see <a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/geotiff/ticket/17" rel="nofollow">ticket #17</a>. libtiff should be piece of cake to do :-) I also try to help Emmanuel with <a href="http://code.google.com/p/gdal-cmake/" rel="nofollow">CMake for GDAL</a>, however recently I've been busy with other things. Basic GDAL features are available for CMake, as far as I remember. Regarding Boost, yes it's a known project lead by Troy. Luigi,

I prepared CMake configuration for libgeotiff – see ticket #17. libtiff should be piece of cake to do :-)
I also try to help Emmanuel with CMake for GDAL, however recently I’ve been busy with other things. Basic GDAL features are available for CMake, as far as I remember.

Regarding Boost, yes it’s a known project lead by Troy.

]]> By: Luigi Calori http://mateusz.loskot.net/2009/09/28/building-liblas-with-cmake/comment-page-1/#comment-2516 Luigi Calori Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:01:13 +0000 http://mateusz.loskot.net/?p=1019#comment-2516 I' m also interested in tiff and gdal CMake build.... If you have something working, I would really be glad to know.... I've helped also the cmakeports http://code.google.com/p/cmakeports/ Regarding Boost .... maybe is unofficial... but seem someone is working on http://sodium.resophonic.com/boost-cmake/current-docs/ I’ m also interested in tiff and gdal CMake build….
If you have something working, I would really be glad to know….
I’ve helped also the cmakeports http://code.google.com/p/cmakeports/

Regarding Boost …. maybe is unofficial… but seem someone is working on
http://sodium.resophonic.com/boost-cmake/current-docs/

]]> By: mloskot http://mateusz.loskot.net/2009/09/28/building-liblas-with-cmake/comment-page-1/#comment-2509 mloskot Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:20:57 +0000 http://mateusz.loskot.net/?p=1019#comment-2509 Vladimir, Thank you for clarification. I admit it was not very clear to me. I updated my post to reflect that the CMake adoption is not migration. Vladimir,

Thank you for clarification. I admit it was not very clear to me. I updated my post to reflect that the CMake adoption is not migration.

]]> By: Vladimir Prus http://mateusz.loskot.net/2009/09/28/building-liblas-with-cmake/comment-page-1/#comment-2508 Vladimir Prus Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:10:37 +0000 http://mateusz.loskot.net/?p=1019#comment-2508 It's concerning how many folks claim that Boost is switching to CMake, while this is not the case, at least yet. Had I expected this effect, I surely would object to addition of any trace of cmake to either trunk or release branches. It’s concerning how many folks claim that Boost is switching to CMake, while this is not the case, at least yet. Had I expected this effect, I surely would object to addition of any trace of cmake to either trunk or release branches.

]]> By: mloskot http://mateusz.loskot.net/2009/09/28/building-liblas-with-cmake/comment-page-1/#comment-2472 mloskot Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:51:27 +0000 http://mateusz.loskot.net/?p=1019#comment-2472 Sure, wherever. Sure, wherever.

]]> By: Emmanuel Christophe http://mateusz.loskot.net/2009/09/28/building-liblas-with-cmake/comment-page-1/#comment-2471 Emmanuel Christophe Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:48:39 +0000 http://mateusz.loskot.net/?p=1019#comment-2471 I'll push it to a mercurial google code repository tomorrow, is that ok with you? I’ll push it to a mercurial google code repository tomorrow, is that ok with you?

]]> By: mloskot http://mateusz.loskot.net/2009/09/28/building-liblas-with-cmake/comment-page-1/#comment-2469 mloskot Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:14:19 +0000 http://mateusz.loskot.net/?p=1019#comment-2469 Hi Emmanuel, Great! Yes, I think I would be interested in joining your effort. Do you host this configuration in some public repository (SVN?). If not, I can host it in my personal Git repository. Hi Emmanuel,

Great! Yes, I think I would be interested in joining your effort. Do you host this configuration in some public repository (SVN?). If not, I can host it in my personal Git repository.

]]> By: Emmanuel Christophe http://mateusz.loskot.net/2009/09/28/building-liblas-with-cmake/comment-page-1/#comment-2468 Emmanuel Christophe Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:17:52 +0000 http://mateusz.loskot.net/?p=1019#comment-2468 Hi Mateusz, I'm actually interested by a CMake configuration for GDAL. Few weeks ago, I gave it a try and I have a working CMakeLists.txt which compile gdal and one of its application. So far (as a demonstration), there are only two formats compiled: one using the internal version provided with gdal (png) and one using the system version (tiff). It will be great if we can cooperate on this, let me know! Emmanuel Hi Mateusz,
I’m actually interested by a CMake configuration for GDAL. Few weeks ago, I gave it a try and I have a working CMakeLists.txt which compile gdal and one of its application.
So far (as a demonstration), there are only two formats compiled: one using the internal version provided with gdal (png) and one using the system version (tiff).
It will be great if we can cooperate on this, let me know!

Emmanuel

]]>